Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default rear bias adjustment

    I have adjusted the rear brake bias the way it says to in the manual with the 5Kg weight suspended from the small hole at the end of the lever arm. As you can see from the 'clean' pieces of metal this has resulted in an adjustment that looks to me to be at the end of the travel of the system anyway.

    Does moving the arm in the direction that I have moved it provide more braking force for the rears (all else being equal) or less????

    jimn~
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    if I'm not mistaken, the harder the car pushes down on the rear wheels, the harder it pulls on the spring. Since you've tightened the spring, it should have put much more power on the rear now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Derbyshire, UK
    Posts
    3,082
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    If it's at the end of travel you could change the spring as it is weak.

    But yes, tight spring means more braking....fitting an uprated (stronger) spring will improve braking again.

    Someone from 155.org used their trolley jack spring

    wrinx
    My Q4 in the Garage

    www.alfaromeo155.co.uk ............................ □□□-V-□□□ .................................. www.ilmostro.co.uk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    before I adjusted it the spring was just "flopping around" as you can see from the pic.. maybe i'd better get a new one?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,677
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    1

    Default

    When I enquired the spring was about ?25, and the normal 155 spring is only about ?4!!

    When you did the adjustment to the bias, were the rear wheels on the ground as I believe they should be for this.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    yep, I did it with the car still on the trailer!

    jimn~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    In my opinion, changing the spring will change the characteristics of the "progression" of breaking depending on how much force is on the rear. You could use this for adjusting it to your preference of course. However, I would say it may be wiser to shorten the length of the spring a bit, so you can pre-load it properly with the weight without changing any of the progressive characteristics. If it's not progressive enough to your taste, you can always swap it out for a heavier one later on. I am quite certain the people at Alfa Romeo played around with this and found this would be a good spring-rate. Of course, your car is modified, you use it for track use, but why change it out before you know if the stock setting is actually to your liking?

    Is the mounting-point for the spring on the rear ARB still in place? If I remember correctly, these are clamp on and it might have moved or come loose even, that would prohibit the regulator from working correctly.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    963
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    Yes the mounting point is still in place, but I think I'd better do as you have suggested and shorten the spring just a little so that there is some tension on it before I do the adjusting. It appears that there has been not tension on it at all in the past.

    Jimn~

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bournemouth UK
    Posts
    4,782
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rides
    1

    Default

    The spring for the rear bias valve is attached to the rear ARB with a clamp, so it may well have slipped and become lose.

    If you change the rear ride height you will need to reset the spring mounting on the ARB otherwise you will have rear brake bias valve permanently set as if the rear of the car is loaded up. The result being too much rear bias in the brakes.
    1994 Alfa Romeo 155 Q4: Dozeing in the garage.
    2009 Audi A4 tdi: Everyday drive.
    1994 Alfa Romeo 155 , 1995cc Std Standard Black

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Webb View Post
    The spring for the rear bias valve is attached to the rear ARB with a clamp, so it may well have slipped and become lose.
    Ah I remembered correctly, the plot thickens. Anyone remember what the correct position of the clamp shoud be with the car on the ground? (only way to set up/adjust the balance is with the car on all 4 wheels) Now I come to think of it, Jim, you *did* adjust this with the wheels properly on the ground?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    819
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhizzMan View Post
    Jim, you *did* adjust this with the wheels properly on the ground?
    Whizz, AlfaJack already mentioned this. Jim has also given the anwser

    :funnypost:

    Greetings,
    Marc
    In a world full of compromise...
    ...some don't.
    ___________________________
    Opel Astra Sports Tourer 110HP 2017
    Alfa 147 1.6 16V 120HP
    Alfa 155 Q4 2.0 16V turbo

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    halfway to the 'ring
    Posts
    232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    with regards to shortening the spring: this will change the progression of the adjuster as well, since the characteristic of the spring will change... the spring characteristics are defined by it's length, diameter of the wire and diameter of the windings...

    move the clamp up and redo the adjusting with the weight. add a few kg to the weight if you want more brake action in the back still...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rides
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cuore_sportivo_155 View Post
    with regards to shortening the spring: this will change the progression of the adjuster as well, since the characteristic of the spring will change... the spring characteristics are defined by it's length, diameter of the wire and diameter of the windings...
    If you don't cut into the windings but in the "straight" part of the spring it shouldn't make a difference. there's a relatively long straight on one side end which you can shorten a few millimeters without changing the characteristics. Given all this, it should have the correct length if the clamp is set correctly. If it's too long it's probably worn and you might want to replace it because it's too weak.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •